HeruSwnAmun
KOL
Reged: 11/02/04
Posts: 64
Loc: Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
I'm still a newbie, so I get a little slack here ~chuckles~
What are the differences between Kemetic Orthodox and Kemetic Traditional religions?
--------------------
|
KheperaAkasha
shemsu
Reged: 08/21/02
Posts: 576
Loc: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Em Hotep HeruSwnAmun *bows*
Good question. I can cover a couple of the basic differences that I know of. Firstly, Kemetic Orthodoxy has a Nisut (the position held by the Pharoah in ancient times, who was aligned with Heru as the ruler of Kemet and considered divine), whereas Per Ankh's person of the most responsiblity is that of our Heri Tep Hem Netjer (the position of the Highest Priest in Kemet who could perform rites in the Nisut's stead when necessary and was/is responsible for the spiritual needs of the people as a priority, but was not considered divine). Secondly, KO has a practice of 'divining Parents' (which overrides a persons *natural* relationship/affinity to a particular Netjer and tells the person Who they are to serve and have a relationship with), whereas KTR has no such divining. As far as we can see from egyptological research this was not a practice of the ancients.
Senebty michelle
-------------------- "We must be the change we wish to see in the world."
- Gandhi
"Pain and foolishness lead to great bliss and complete knowledge, for Eternal Wisdom created nothing under the sun in vain."
-Kahlil Gibran, "The Voice of the Poet"
|
HeruSwnAmun
KOL
Reged: 11/02/04
Posts: 64
Loc: Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
Ahhh, so Per Ankh is more KTR and of course Kemet.org is KO. I feel as though Per Ankh may be more to my way of thinking then.
Ok, foolish question # 2, I know that Per Ankh is a sisterhood of temples. Are there many guys in Per Ankh and are there any plans to build Temples closer to the East coast? (I live in Atlanta, Georgia)
--------------------
|
AnkhesenAset
KOL
Reged: 11/18/01
Posts: 268
Loc: Naples, Italy for the moment
|
|
Em Hotep, HeruSwnAmun and welcome to the boards.
I don't think that Per Ankh being a sisterhood of temples is really supposed to state that members are mostly female. I think it's just more a term for the collectivness, and interconnectedness of the temples that are affiliated with each other. I know of a few men here.
-------------------- May Ma'at guide and Aset protect you,
Heather
|
WabAndy
Wab Priest
Reged: 12/31/02
Posts: 453
Loc: New Hampshire
|
|
Hotep *bow*
A couple of thoughts that may be usefull clarification... Per Ankh is the temple which hosts KOL and we practice Kemetic Traditional Religion.
netjer.org is the site for the House of Netjer, a totaly different temple that practices Kemetic Orthodox - and in adition to the differences which Khep talked about - which are some of the bigest in practice - I think it's also worth mentioning that the theology and thought process is quite different. To my mind, what truley defines a temple (or any other organisation) is the way of looking at the world - the worldview - that it asks it's members to take on. Per Ankh does this very directley, in that in our classes we are asking you directley to try on the KTR world view.... which is a very long winded way of geting to saying that Per Ankh and HON have VERY different world views - I'm not going to try to go into spisifics - but it's something that's imortant to keep in mind...
Regarding the Sisterhood of Temples - right now Per Ankh only has one temple - the main temple Per Sekhmet - which is housed at the home of Rev Sedgwick and Rev Renee - so as you can imagine, with members all over the world, physicaly going to the temple is not a primary part of our practice - though there certaly are open retreats, and arangements can be made for private work with the Revs as well. but in the long run, yes we hope to have many more temples in many locations - for instance, I'm in New Hampshire.
As to guys in the temple - there are quite a few - I don't know the exact number, but we are around...
Take care,
Andy
-------------------- Andy Dolph, Wab Priest Aset-Hethert
Per Ankh The Traditional Reigion of Ancient Egypt
|
HeruSwnAmun
KOL
Reged: 11/02/04
Posts: 64
Loc: Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
Em Hotep Andy, ~bows right back~
I'd agree with you in that: "what truly defines a temple (or any other organisation) is the way of looking at the world - the worldview - that it asks it's members to take on."
However being a newbie and not knowing the specifics, it's hard to make any decisions.
From what I've heard I think I would have to lean toward the KTR way of thinking, is there anyway you could share those world views? You could email me privately if you want.
--------------------
|
WabAndy
Wab Priest
Reged: 12/31/02
Posts: 453
Loc: New Hampshire
|
|
Quote:
From what I've heard I think I would have to lean toward the KTR way of thinking, is there anyway you could share those world views? You could email me privately if you want.
take a look at this: 16 principles
that's a good place to start. this isn't something one comes to understand in a day or two... so in that sense it's not something that I can share in a simple way... developing in this faith (including training for the priesthood) is mostly about learning to live the KTR worldview more and more fully.
I feel like I'm not speeking clearley, I'm very tired so I'm going to stop now... but please feel free to ask questions either on the boards or privatley.
Andy
-------------------- Andy Dolph, Wab Priest Aset-Hethert
Per Ankh The Traditional Reigion of Ancient Egypt
|
HeruSwnAmun
KOL
Reged: 11/02/04
Posts: 64
Loc: Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
Oh I have, in fact I've printed it out. I feel it's the most inspiring document I've ever come across. (Rev Renee should be proud) I guess what I'm saying is I don't know what to compare it too. Doesn't KO think that way too?
--------------------
|
MeritAset
KOL
Reged: 01/15/03
Posts: 13
Loc: NSW, Australia
|
|
Em Hotep *henu*
I'm a KO'er so let me explain the differences as I perceove them.
The 16 Priniciples are almost identical to what we believe. However in KO, we have our Nisut-Bityt whom we believe to be the 196th Pharaoh as she underwent a coronation ceremony in Egypt on 6th Nov 1996. We consider her to be our "spiritual leader" and head honcho of the Temple and our faith. Also training to be a priest or W'ab of a Name is something that is not open to everyone. There is a lot more structural hierachy I've found. It's not to everyone's taste which is understandable.
But the belefts in Netjer and worship are the same.
Senebty, MeritAset
-------------------- Aset's Beloved One
Sat Aset, Meryt Heru-Wr
|
Isian
KOL
Reged: 03/15/04
Posts: 481
Loc: NSW, Australia
|
|
Em Hotep, MeritAset~bow~ 
You said... Quote:
The 16 Priniciples are almost identical to what we believe.
Putting the emphasis on 'almost', would you feel adept enough to speak about the difference between KO and KTR on this point? 
~hug~
|
MeritAset
KOL
Reged: 01/15/03
Posts: 13
Loc: NSW, Australia
|
|
Quote:
Em Hotep, MeritAset~bow~ 
You said... Quote:
The 16 Priniciples are almost identical to what we believe.
Putting the emphasis on 'almost', would you feel adept enough to speak about the difference between KO and KTR on this point? 
~hug~
Em Hotep Jen *huggles*
Well the main difference IMO is that KO is way more structured and dogmatic. We are divined and "assigned" a Parent and/or Beloved. The Priesthood is different too. Not everyone who wants to be a priest CAN be a priest. The Nisut pretty much makes the final choice there. And we HAVE a Nisut who is invested with the Kingly Ka of Heru and considered 196th Pharaoh by KO'ers.
I guess to put it in a nutshell - it's stricter and more structured IMO.
Senebty, MeritAset
-------------------- Aset's Beloved One
Sat Aset, Meryt Heru-Wr
|
Lilairen
KOL
Reged: 02/20/03
Posts: 323
Loc: Massachusetts
|
|
The other major thing I've been able to glean is that the KO attitude is more likely to recognise the netjerw as unified, and the KTR attitude is more likely to recognise them as distinct but linked entities.
-------------------- Daughter of Het-Herw and Khnum, Beloved of Set and Wepwawet
Chatting with: Anpw, Djehuty, Bast, Nebet-Het, and Sekhmet
|
Isian
KOL
Reged: 03/15/04
Posts: 481
Loc: NSW, Australia
|
|
Em Hotep, Lilairen ~bow~
You are speaking of the 'One and the Many' concept? In regards to that... (hoping either yourself or MeritAset might be able to answer this), if KO believes in the Oneness of the Netjer, why are they so strict as to what 'aspect' of the Netjer each person worships in relation to the Parent and Beloved? It appears to make little sense to put all the Netjer in the One basket and then play specifics when it comes to individual worship. But perhaps I have the wrong perspective on it?
with respect senebty! Jen Grant
|
Lilairen
KOL
Reged: 02/20/03
Posts: 323
Loc: Massachusetts
|
|
Quote:
In regards to that... (hoping either yourself or MeritAset might be able to answer this), if KO believes in the Oneness of the Netjer, why are they so strict as to what 'aspect' of the Netjer each person worships in relation to the Parent and Beloved? It appears to make little sense to put all the Netjer in the One basket and then play specifics when it comes to individual worship. But perhaps I have the wrong perspective on it?
As far as I know, the only restriction the KO place on individual worship with regards to parents is that only children of a particular netjer may become priests of that netjer.
The KO do strike me as placing more emphasis on the One and the KTR on the Many, yes, but that wasn't quite what I was referring to. It's my understanding, for example, that the KO consider Hethert and Sekhmet to be one entity with two 'faces', as it were, and while a person may be more strongly aligned with one or the other face, it's all one netjert, whereas the KTR recognise Het-herw, Sekhmet, and the syncretic Hetharu-Sekhmet, strongly interrelated, capable of transforming into each other, but distinct.
-------------------- Daughter of Het-Herw and Khnum, Beloved of Set and Wepwawet
Chatting with: Anpw, Djehuty, Bast, Nebet-Het, and Sekhmet
|
RevRenee
Founder-Wehemu
Reged: 06/12/01
Posts: 2727
Loc: Racine Wisconsin
|
|
Em hotep all
<bow>
Good discussion so far. Let's take a step back. I always find which sort "differences" or "similarities" to be picked out interesting. There are different sorts of differences.
Some have to do with beliefs- but also remember that the Ancient Egyptian Religion was NOT based on a certain set of beliefs per-se. On issues such as what happened after death different temples took different positions -- yet THAT did not make them a different religion. This was the case with many ancient faiths.
Modern religions tend to be based on what they "believe" and a sort of set of "truths" of the faith. The Orthodox such as Greek Orthodox and the Catholic Church split over what might be considered a matter of a single belief about the trinity- Whether the Holy Spirit was manifested through The Father and then through the Son (Jesus) or through the Father AND the Son (Jesus) together)
Now when we look at such a difference on the surface it may seem insignificant. Both of these are Christian and use terms describe a trinity which relates three persons in one God...so the matter of direction of "flow" between persons in the Trinity creating a rift seems --well-- silly.
On the level of practices- both give Eucharist and believe it IS the body of Christ and the Greek Orthodox have better incense (I think even the most mainstream Catholic would agree heh)
Even here comparing say Greek Orthodox and Catholic on the basis of beliefs and practices can be misleading.
There is something much deeper that underlies the differences and practices so that their set of beliefs and practices "make sense" to practitioners. It is what Wab Andy called World View. The difference between talking about "beliefs" and talking about "worldview" is that worldview has to do with how beliefs, practices, scholarship methods, organizational structures and such all hang together.
I really hesitated in developing the 16 principles because the LAST thing I wanted was to set up our faith with a set of prescribed beliefs. Yet as modern people beliefs are how we come to understand a culture initially. The 16 principles are more like pre-suppositions that affect HOW we approach the world and our faith through the glasses of Kemetic Traditionalism.
I can assure you we wear VERY different glasses and as a result our understandings of what scholarship is important and relevant and our approach to it is very different, how we train our people and our expectations of them are different, while we may both use terms like "Ma'at" and "Responsibility" we will apply these differently because the meaning an implications of these terms are different for the two groups.
Rites will be very similar where they are ancient ones--but where they draw on the temples experience of Netjer they will likely be different as the two sets of glasses will discern and experience energies of the different Netjeru differently and come to different communal conclusions on the basis of these experiences.
A little vague..I know. Yet you can compare ANY two things in so many ways! I will make another post to give a sense of some of what I see as critically different.
Best
-------------------- Rev Renee Levant, Hemet Sekhmet & Aset
Founder & Wehemu & Educational Director
Per Ankh: The Traditional Religion of Ancient Egypt
http://www.per-ankh.org
Edited by RevRenee (11/18/04 04:56 AM)
|
RevRenee
Founder-Wehemu
Reged: 06/12/01
Posts: 2727
Loc: Racine Wisconsin
|
|
Hotep Lilairen
As far as I know, the only restriction the KO place on individual worship with regards to parents is that only children of a particular netjer may become priests of that netjer.
Yes in KO one may become a Priest only of ones own "paren" as divined by their leader.
That is correct. We find that some people are called to a particular Netjer who seems to have been with them always--for others changes in relationships happen throughout their life. The Ancient Egyptians did not divine a "parent" Netjer" the practice is completley a modern HON practice
In Per Ankh we can and do do divinations when these are appropriate. I have divined on which Netjer a member most resonates in their own energy and way of being in the world.
At times it is this same netjer whose lessons and way of being are most needed...other times a different, complementary or even oppositional sort of personality is more effective and we find the Netjeru do not hesitate to make contact as They find to be effective regardless of the first divination
We do divations to discover if one is on track on their path and a variety of other things.
Sometimes we will not do a divination when asked because to do so would short circuit the individuals process of development:) They hate when we pull that.
HOW we decide when these are appropriate tells you a lot about our worldview but that is another thread.
In Ancient times people were not viewed as having a single parent to whom you are "child" for life in the way HON describes. This practice is one common among certain modern syncretic African traditions and is not found in either Ancient Egyptian or African Traditions
and in Per Ankh the call to serve as Priest is not necessarily connected to the Netjer with whom one most resonates! Given that Priestly roles were often changed and such we do not see placing such a limitation on Netjer as making good sense.
The KO do strike me as placing more emphasis on the One and the KTR on the Many, yes, but that wasn't quite what I was referring to.
Well some of you Per Ankh folk place more on the Many ! *pout* heh Drives most of the PRIESTS NUTS-- Just kidding...sort of. All members of Per Ankh believe that Netjer is both One and Many. In Ancient times there were a number of different ways the relationship between the One and the Many was described, understood and worshipped we maintain this same flexibility
It's my understanding, for example, that the KO consider Hethert and Sekhmet to be one entity with two 'faces', as it were, and while a person may be more strongly aligned with one or the other face, it's all one netjert, whereas the KTR recognise Het-herw, Sekhmet, and the syncretic Hetharu-Sekhmet, strongly interrelated, capable of transforming into each other, but distinct.
I think that is basically correct and really important. Let me elaborate a bit.. They began the practice of naming the netjer served of any "Aset Priest" -- Priest/child of Aset/Serqet or any Sekhmet Priest/Child -- Priest or chikd of Sekhmet/Hethert any Hethert priest/child priest/child of Hethert/Sekhmet
In Ancient times though some netjer may have closer relationships to certain other netjer.. there were numerous and very different manifestations of the different Netjeru. Relations differed some with different manifestations
You will not find such a concept in Ancient Egyptian materials as a rule. You will find certain temple Priesthoods or cetain individuals to describe manifestations that have these netjer so deeply interwoven that when one is present the other is never far behind. You will also find three's like these. But you will find the same Netjer which appear in two's and three's in many other configurations. You will also find manifestations of Sekhemt and of Hethert where when one is present the other stays far far away.
This diversity of manifestation and experience seems true in modern Kemetic Traditionalist experience as well as it was in Ancient Egypt
Again, in African religions because of the understanding that EVERYTHING is an interconnected matrix of powers and forces a whole lot of variety is possible.
It was my experience of Hon in the past and with these recent beliefs and practices that they do not live in a worldview of this African sort of dynamic interactive matrix of forces and energies. In such a worldview the practices discussed above would not make sense. But they DO make sense to them
Here is where I believe the "divine" Nisut issue is a MUCH bigger difference than whether one has or does not have a 'Nisut" or the role of that Nisut.
Think for a moment. If you REALLY believed that the leader of your organization IS Divine-- that her (they would say Her) divinity is what let's God lead the group, That She had knowledge of 196 other Nisut's in Her head and was given the task of rebuilding the Ancient Egyptian faith in the modern world...that her members are her "children" and your temple is THE nation of Kemet, your elders its princes and princesses--how would that affect your organization?
I mean if You were among the 12 apostles following Jesus and other religious folks did not recognize Him as divine-- even IF Jesus said (as he is reported to have done in scriptures) "Hey you guys cut it out respect those of other faiths" (no not a direct quote) would this not affect your sense of who YOU were and who THEY were?
Would it not affect your religious rites in some drastic ways? Would not your desire for the love and approval and teachings of this divine being in your midst start to take central importance in your faith, in decisions about everything the organization would do, what rites would be added to a new young faith and so forth?
Well take a look at how the rites they have chosen to make central to their temple flow so naturally from this and all serve to concentrate religious experience in and through the center-- the mediator-- the Nisut:
1. Divination ---
2. Naming --
3. Coronation renewal major event of retreats
4. Special Oaths of loyalty and even willingness to die for the leader required as a step to the level before Priesthood
5.Saq viewed as ABSOLUTE word of Netjer not mediated by the person in Saq
(Side note: though in recent years they have been saying partly divine almost implying her humanity and divinity can be separated at times I have letters from their leader denying that she ever speaks as anything other than the Nisut and that her shemsu should always hear their parents voice in her voice because she is always in a sort of saq of their parent Netjer)
All in all I see in all this a strong atmosphere of a sort of attitude and level of control that could only be justified by the idea that Tamara Suida is divine.
I have spoken elsewhere and been very upfront in stating that these characteristics step over the line from a hierarchical or "orthodox" religion to the dynamics associated with cults
You can find posts on the various practices discussed here in the KOL members area (use the search function)
How does one decide between temples? Well you think about what it is YOU feel called to learn and how you want to grow in Netjer and you pray a lot..and most of all..sit back a while. There is no rush. Don't jump one way or the other at the first event or experience...sit back and let time reveal your path to you..let Netjer reveal your path
From a Per Ankh perspective this is a process of getting to know yourself and Netjer and living into a worldview for a while and then seeing how it "fits". Of course sometimes Netjer provides inspiration in the form of a two by four to get us moving.More often though we live and grow and learn in our own way at our own pace...whether we want too go faster or slower:) Life is powerful and we are all a part of a matrix of energies and forces and beings which are constantly interacting. Over time patterns emerge and we may take steps to maintain or to shift those patterns through our actions.
In any one moment we do not have a complete picture of all options and possibilities. There is abundance there...in ALL circumstances-- whether we recognize it..or not. But Life continues, Netjer Continues, Ma'at continues and our Ka continues to strive for fulfillment. At some point we rejoice in the striving itself and it is at that point..we have arrived home.
-------------------- Rev Renee Levant, Hemet Sekhmet & Aset
Founder & Wehemu & Educational Director
Per Ankh: The Traditional Religion of Ancient Egypt
http://www.per-ankh.org
Edited by RevRenee (11/18/04 05:09 AM)
|
HeruSwnAmun
KOL
Reged: 11/02/04
Posts: 64
Loc: Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
That does make sense but still being a newbie myself it might help me if you can further explain:
Quote:
I can assure you we wear VERY different glasses and as a result our understandings of what scholarship is important and relevant and our approach to it is very different, how we train our people and our expectations of them are different, while we may both use terms like "Ma'at" and "Responsibility" we willapply these differently because the meaning an implications of these terms are different for the two groups.
It might help me to understand the two groups if I know "How do the two groups differ in their definiton in the meaning and implications of those terms?"
--------------------
|
HeruSwnAmun
KOL
Reged: 11/02/04
Posts: 64
Loc: Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
That makes total sense, thank you Rev Levant
--------------------
|
RevRenee
Founder-Wehemu
Reged: 06/12/01
Posts: 2727
Loc: Racine Wisconsin
|
|
Hotep Merit, Jen and all
<bow>
I was thinking of MeritAset's post suggesting that HON is stricter and more structured.
Well-- sort of Yes...and sort of No
For example, you mentioned that in HON the call to Priesthood must be confirmed by their top leader/king/Nisut and not everyone can be a Priest
Well in Per Ankh not everyone can be a Priest and the decision must be approved by the council of priests and our Heri Tep Hem Netjer _ Rev Sedgwick Heskett
However in Per Ankh anyone can put themselves forward to enter training for the Priesthood. However, starting the training program and making it THROUGH that program are two very different matters ;-)
A few who were in Hon and per-Ankh have suggested that WE are much stricter. If HON's leader beleives Netjer has said you are called..AND the time is now-- you are in training and it takes a LOT to get kicked OUT of training or Priesthood
With us, you have to set up a plan (approved by Educational director (myself) and meeting certain requirements) and make actual progress in meeting it botgh in your personal life and in the temple. In addition depending on your particular call you must have the secular credentials appropriate to what you plan to do within the temple. So if you want to do spiritual direction you will need to have the appropriate training for counseling folks (say NLP training or college program etc). If you want to teach you must have credentials in that which you wish to teach or prove to us you have the skills providing appropriate documentation and so forth.
In other words we operate much like a mainstream Christian/Jewish or Buddhist seminary. Your main training or direction lies in meetings and work with your Sebau in the temple. In these we expect our candidates to be challenged on some of their deepest issues and learn and grow...however depending on your call you set up a program which includes external credentials as appropriate.
In some senses then you could say we are stricter:)
What I do think is that we take the idea that their are ALWAYS OTHER OPTIONS seriously. If something doesn't work-- we can think of something else and try it instead.
We are not fundementalist
And while we are VERY hierarchical we are a lot more open about our plans and such with members and have more conversations about temple issues. We are not very big on secrecy or Oaths of Loyalty.
On the other hand-- there is no question about who has authority and makes the decisions and our Priests are expected to do what we ask them to do--even if it makes them uncomfortable.
(Of course they can and SHOULD LATER discuss and reflect on the issue)
I do think we have ore flow of input from those of lower "rank" that gets taken seriously-- especially from those who do the work and contribute time to the community and have worked more to live inside of the worldview.
This can seem less strict I guess:)
To me its just being greedy:) I mean why not get all the value we can from members. Given that we are a hierarchy and know clearly where the power lies to make the decision there really is no reason for Priests to feel threatened by suggestions or ideas from members. Our discussions can open up new ways of thinking or bring things to our attenton that were not part of our considerations, or even help us think of other ideas.....and in the end we know we decide so why not? heh
Is that more or less strict
-------------------- Rev Renee Levant, Hemet Sekhmet & Aset
Founder & Wehemu & Educational Director
Per Ankh: The Traditional Religion of Ancient Egypt
http://www.per-ankh.org
Edited by RevRenee (11/18/04 04:49 AM)
|
MeritAset
KOL
Reged: 01/15/03
Posts: 13
Loc: NSW, Australia
|
|
Hotep all *henus*
Sorry for my absence. I have been nursing a dislocated shoulder (mega ouchies) but have been following this thread.
I can understand yourlast post Renee where you differentiated between things probably a lot more clearly than I did.
I guess I tend to see the fact that I can't just say to Hemet "Hey I wanna be a W'ab for Aset" and be made one. ALso I can't say "But I really want to be Sekhmet's daughter and be a W'ab for Her" - as stricter.
From what I gather, one is free to worship Netjer in any aspect whereas Aset is my Parent and is to be honoured at all times. (Mind you, Aset and I have a very strong tie and She is not backwards in being forwards and hitting me with the cosmic 2x4 if she's s tad pissed off with me). I also find that it's almost necessary to "ask permission" of your Parent to start working with or honouring your Beloved. I find these "rules" stricter than the KOL way of honouring ALL facets of Netjer.
But thanks for clarifying that as it helps me understand the differences more clearly.
Senebty, MeritAset
-------------------- Aset's Beloved One
Sat Aset, Meryt Heru-Wr
|
RevRenee
Founder-Wehemu
Reged: 06/12/01
Posts: 2727
Loc: Racine Wisconsin
|
|
Hotep there
<bow>
Heh... having to ask permission of your parent to worship your beloved...LOL
Sounds like you might be an Aset kid...an Aset kid and NOT an Aset-Hethert kid *big grin*
I would be surprised though if in HOn you were expected to ask Yinepu permission to worship a beloved.
I wonder if some of the " strictness" you refer to comes from Our Mom
Also just to be clear .....the process of discerning who you are called to serve and with whom you most resonate in Kemetic Traditionalism is one of mutual discernment. You can't walk up to myself or to our Heri Tep and say I want to serve so and so as a priest and expect it to be so:) We have told people they are not called to serve in ways they believed they were. And yes on KOL we take people's statements of their connections with Netjer somewhat at face value. However, what we tale seriously is their EXPERIENCE. We do not believe everyone who says "I have experienced Bast" have. What we take seriously is that they had AN experience that is important to them. Were they to continue training there would be a process of discernment about IDENTIFYING that experience as an experience OF BAST. The same with those who feel they resonate most with a particular Netjer. We find however that as people move more into our community and worldview their perspective on how to identify experiences and our's end usually end up in full agreement.
There have been times when we "knew" someone was called to serve a different Netjer than they expected. We never told Wab Jen that She was to be a Priest of Ptah for example..until she told us:)
Of course, had she not discerned this on her own we would have had to do so before her ceremony. And Wab Andy was not forewarned before his ceremony that neither the Netjer who has been in his life so long nor the one (in the case the same) he was to serve as Priest was quite Whom he thought:)
Of course we didn't know that until we were told right before the ceremony by Aset-Hethert herself. And in Saq things have happened and been decided that contradicted us on several occassions ! So much for process then eh?
So while an individual can say " Rev- I feel called to Priesthood and want to begin training" and they are encouraged if they believe they are called to a certain Priesthood to share that...what actually happens other than their getting a chance to discern if they are really callled to either that/those Netjeru in particular and in what way ...and whether or not they are called to Priesthood is a process which while best when mutual...and we do strive for that..is ultimately decided by Netjer and the discernment of what Netjer has decided or the affirmation (or not) of the individuals process comes from the Sebau of the temple.
It's much like a trraditional seminary. You can decide to enroll in seminary on your own. Whether you become a minister, priest etc depends on what you do and the discernment of the church community and it's appointed leaders. Differences in these seminaries tend to be around how the individuals process is respected or handled not where ultimate authority lies.
As far as UltimatE authority-- those of us who serve or resonate with Aset in particular know --OH boy DO WE KNOW..
And when we forget_THAT_ we KNOW (as we do) She does not hesitate to remind us... Hey, MeritAset was that your blood on that last two by four I got hit with?
Very Best
Rev Renee
-------------------- Rev Renee Levant, Hemet Sekhmet & Aset
Founder & Wehemu & Educational Director
Per Ankh: The Traditional Religion of Ancient Egypt
http://www.per-ankh.org
Edited by RevRenee (11/20/04 05:06 AM)
|
MeritAset
KOL
Reged: 01/15/03
Posts: 13
Loc: NSW, Australia
|
|
Quote:
Hotep there <bow> Sounds like you might be an Aset kid...an Aset kid and NOT an Aset-Hethert kid *big grin* I wonder if some of the " strictness" you refer to comes from Our Mom 
As far as UltimatE authority-- those of us who serve or resonate with Aset in particular know --OH boy DO WE KNOW.. And when we forget_THAT_ we KNOW (as we do) She does not hesitate to remind us... Hey, MeritAset was that your blood on that last two by four I got hit with?
Very Best
Rev Renee
Hotep Rev :-)
Oh yeah sorry about that, it WOULD be my blood no doubt :-D
I was Divined as a purely Aset kid and do believe that I get Her in a non-aspected light.
And yes we DO know don't we? :-D
The strictness may very well be inherited from "Mum" because She tends to be very black and white with me.
Senebty, MeritAset
-------------------- Aset's Beloved One
Sat Aset, Meryt Heru-Wr
|
RevSedgwick
Heri Tep Hem Netjer
Reged: 04/12/02
Posts: 361
Loc: Racine, WI
|
|
Em hotep, everyone! <bow>
Rev Renee made a long substantive post in response to this thread, which I think introduces ideas that can usefully be discussed in their own thread. So I've moved her post to a new thread in the Living Kemet forum and started a new discussion. It would be great if a lot of folks jumped into the water there. It's called Religion and Religious Beliefs/Practices.
Rev Sedgwick
-------------------- Rev Sedgwick Heskett, Hemet NebetHet-Nit and Amun
Heri Tep Hem Netjer Per Ankh
Per Ankh: The Traditional Religion of Ancient Egypt
http://www.per-ankh.org
|